Like you, I've been watching Chris
Christie's unfolding bridge scandal with a combination of horrified fascination
and an eerie sense of déjà vu.
It's all so Nixonian, with "I
am not a bully" replacing "I am not a crook" as the iconic catchphrase.
Of course, Nixon turned out actually to be a crook, and I have no doubt that
New Jersey legislators who have crossed swords with the combative governor in
the past will start trotting out other examples of his bullyboy style.
As of this writing, there is still
no smoking gun connecting Christie directly to the bridge closure. But he has
the reputation of being a control freak, to put it mildly, and it strains
credulity to believe that his closest aides would dare to pull this off without
his OK.
What's harder to understand is why
politicians engage in such risky behavior, especially when it's so unnecessary.
Nixon was already coasting to re-election in 1972. The economy was on the
upswing, the Democrats were in disarray, the country was dazzled by his opening
to China, and Henry Kissinger had come back from the negotiations with the
North Vietnamese in Paris announcing, "Peace is at hand." (It wasn't,
but we didn't know that at the time.)
So why did Nixon need to gild the
lily by breaking into DNC headquarters at the Watergate? Why did Christie, who
was already riding a 22-point lead in the polls, need to bludgeon Democratic
mayors into endorsing him? And why did he - or, at least, his closest aides - take
it so personally when one mayor refused, to the point of retaliating by
paralyzing his city for four days?
I think the answer is that some
very neurotic people get into politics. Nixon's mental problems are well known,
and Christie may have been scarred for other reasons.
Sometimes a neurosis can be an
asset in politics, especially if it makes you obsessive in pursuit of your
goal. But neurosis also has a downside: Like actors, politicians often confuse
the cheers of the crowd with love. And the more cheers they get, the more loved
they feel.
So for Nixon, it wasn't enough to
win 49 states; he wanted all 50. He wouldn't settle for a landslide; only an
avalanche would do. And he was willing to take some serious risks to get it.
Ditto for Christie. He wanted to
pad his victory margin so badly, he wasted $12 million of the taxpayers' money
scheduling a special election for a vacant Senate seat in October rather than
waiting for the regular election a month later, just so he wouldn't have to
share the ballot with a popular Democrat - Newark Mayor Cory Booker - who was
running for the Senate.
Nixon's won his big victory, but his
risky behavior ended up destroying his presidency. And while Christie might be
able to salvage his job as governor – but not if any more evidence linking him
to the closure or the "traffic study" cover-up pops up – he can
forget about being president. I'll bet Rand Paul, Paul Ryan and Ted Cruz are
already preparing their attack ads.
Marx was right: "History
repeats itself, the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce."
Reach Martin Snapp at catman@sunset.net.